Skip to main content

3…. 2…….. 1!

Just a short round up this evening of the day’s action from day 2 of the Aegon Championships at Queen’s club. If you read my earlier series '5 things we learned from the French Open 2017' then you will know that lesson 5 highlighted the unpredictable nature of the men’s and woman’s games so far this year. Today’s results have only strengthened this belief.

All started innocently enough as third seed Milos Raonic took to the centre court to face world number 698 Thanasi Kokkinakis. Although these stats make it sound like a demolition should have ensued the encounter was never going to be that straight forward. Raonic has not had a particularly convincing 2017 season so far. He has struggled with injury and is currently ranked number 16 in the ATP race to London. Opponent Kokkinakis had been ranked as highly as world number 69 back in June 2015 and is only 21 years old so clearly has talent well above what recent form would suggest. Still, with Kokkinakis low on match play (having undergone battles with injury in the past year) and Raonic coming into the grass season which has historically brought him good results, not many would have bet against the Canadian. Hence, when Raonic wasted 8 brake point opportunities in the first set and was stretched to a tie breaker it did not yet seem like time to panic. However, Kokkinakis raised his level shaking off the rust we would have expected to clinch the first set. He maintained this level for a straight sets victory 7-6 (7-5), 7-6(10-8). Raonic did not play badly but was sloppy at the net at times and ultimately did not take the chances he was given where his opponent most definitely did.

Third seed out and so second seed up! French Open runner up Stan Wawrinka was next on court to face Feliciano Lopez: a tough 1st round for any player in the draw. The first match when transitioning from clay to grass is often a hard one and Wawrinka has expressed a lack of confidence on this surface compared to his trusty hard courts. It was not surprising that the first set was tight but Wawrinka was over reliant on his serve for free points throughout as he was clearly the more uncomfortable moving around the court. At times Wawrinka seemed to flex and stretch his left leg perhaps indicating some small discomfort around the knee. Hopefully this will not be a major problem for him heading into Wimbledon as he has the chance to capitalise on his 2nd round defeat last year by gaining all important ranking points. His 7-6(7-4), 7-5 defeat to Lopez has, however, meant that it is Djokovic who will receive the 2nd seeding at the third grand slam of the year.

World number 1 and defending queens’ champion Andy Murray has had difficulties this year but his run to the French Open semi-finals indicated that things may have been looking up. With two upsets complete it seemed unlikely that a third would follow suit. When opponent Alijaz Bedene pulled out of the first round and was replaced by lucky loser Jordan Thompson from qualifying Murray fans would be forgiven for having thought the result was in no doubt. Yet as the match unfolded Murray and supporters alike may have wished that Bedene had attempted to play as it was clear to see Thompson was in no way overwhelmed by the situation. He displayed determination and composure en route to a 7-6(7-4), 6-2 win: the biggest of his career to date. Murray, on the other hand, looked out of sorts sending many shots long and even more into the net. A worrying sign ahead of his Wimbledon defence.

The top 3 seeds all out in straight set succession. 3 2 1. Quite a shocking day. However the greatest surprise was yet to come. Yes, you guessed it! A Cilic vs. Isner match which did not involve any tie breaks!!! Fourth seed Marin Cilic restored order to the proceedings with a 7-5, 6-3 victory that took just over an hour.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

#Tennis Kids of Instagram

There is only one way that a sport like tennis can grow. We need young people to continue to watch, participate in and improve our sport: so it’s nice to see on Instagram that there are no shortage of kids and young adults who love our sport! For anyone who isn’t familiar with the ‘Rich kids of Instagram’ it is a verified Insta account that gives an insight into the world of 20 somethings with way too much money (which is often, but not always, from their parents) and their lavish lifestyles. If you want to check it out then please do but please, READ THIS FIRST!  Anyway, it got me thinking I should do some real journalism for once and that we need to celebrate the stories behind the hard working, enthusiastic, ambitious and inspiring ‘Tennis Kids of Instagram’. The future of our sport! Here are the stories of 4 very different but equally amazing 5-17 year olds who all share one thing: they love tennis. This article is written in order of age category so please read right to the e

5 things we learned from the French Open 2017: Lesson 5

Lesson #5 The game is in flux! Okay, so, a little contradictory? I know: I’m just after implying that the matches at this year’s French Open were more predictable than normal and I stand by it! In terms of outcome that is. As I said, it appeared that identifying which player was physically stronger often answered the question of who would win. So if we could guess the result then what do I mean by ‘the game is in flux’? Well firstly let us think back on some of the score lines from the tournament. While it is true that the winner was often predictable the manner in which they got there was so often not. The Halep vs Svitolina encounter was always going to be a tight one. Hence, the fact Svitolina stretched her to 3 sets was pretty regular. But if anyone foresaw the demolition that would follow in the decider then I would like to congratulate you and maybe even employ you to write these for me! The momentum was so obviously with Svitolina….so how come Halep took it 6-0?? She

Mid-Season Roundup: Injury Issues

There was a running theme throughout this year’s Wimbledon and unfortunately it was not a positive one. We have become accustomed to talking about the impact of the weather at Wimbledon over the years and the impact it can have as a third player, but this year the spotlight was on a different issue: injury! Indeed, it was the talk of the first round as the centre court crowd saw two consecutive mid-match retirements when both Klizan and Dolgopolov succumbed to injuries they had carried into the tournament. Under current rules a player may not take a medical time out in circumstances where the issue already existed before the match. Hence, they had no option but to concede defeat….. Or did they? I only ask because the decision sparked a lot of controversy! For those that didn’t hear the discussions, a first round Wimbledon loser gets around £30,000 (maybe as much as £35,000- I honestly don’t remember) for participating in the tournament: regardless of the score-line. This, o