Skip to main content

Johanna Konta: Which way next?

Almost two years ago exactly I watched a girl play tennis. She was a fairly normal girl in nearly every way except for one: this girl was someone that we would all come to know as Jo Konta, British number 1 and current world number 8.

It was 2015 and the Aegon International tournament was being televised for the first time by the BBC. My money was on Caroline Wozniaki to lift the woman’s singles trophy but I was wrong. This prize went to Belinda Bencic who defeated Agnieszka Radwanska in the final to emerge the victor from a very strong field. However, in retrospect, none of this became my most enduring memory of the tournament. Surprisingly, all I can really remember was watching one of the wildcard entrants. She was a local girl who was ranked around the 150 mark in the world. I wasn’t expecting much from her: just another home hope that the commentators were excited about who would probably have an unremarkable career when all was said and done. But still I settled down to watch…just in case.

I was incredibly glad that I did.

It is easy to say now, with the benefit of hindsight, but corny as it sounds; I knew I was watching someone special. The question was, how special? She was certainly a talent capable of exceeding her then rank. Potential for top 20? Definitely. Top 10? Quite possibly. World number 1? To be honest, I didn’t think so.

But she was not far off potential wise. She was 24 years old and hitting her groundstrokes with pinpoint accuracy. 24 is not exactly prehistoric (I grant you) but on the WTA tour it was a fairly late age to be first hearing her name. I liked to think I was aware of who the rising stars in Britain were. Names like Heather Watson, Laura Robson, Naomi Broady and Katie Swan were batted back and forth. So where had this girl been???

Wherever she had been hiding it was evident where she was heading as over the next year and a half she continued to ascend and ascend the tennis ladder. The term stratospheric rise may be overused but in the case of Johanna Konta it truly does seem apt. By the next time she returned to play Eastbourne in 2016 she was top 50 and a serious contender to win the title. Only as recently as 2 months ago she peaked at her highest ranking to date of world number 6 and we now talk about her as the bookies third favourite to win Wimbledon 2017 and the owner of possibly the most reliable and effective second serve in the woman’s game.

Yet, there has always to me seemed to be something rather fragile about Jo Konta.

She comes across as a sweet and engaging, though ultimately introverted, character. There is a kind of nervous energy about her. Anne Keothavong (who spent a lot of time mentoring Konta when she was a junior) has described her as ‘quirky’ frequently. Whatever that means. My thoughts are that most of the time she is very bubbly and smiley but, just occasionally, she has looked like a very emotional-dare I say slightly unstable?-person who is capable of meltdown and self-implosion at any moment. I just get the feeling that she could burst into tears on court at any time. That it could all very easily get too much for her. Seriously though, from the first time I watched her I have been simultaneously in awe of and slightly worried about her. Hence, I was very happy to hear she has worked with a sports psychologist to help her with the mental side of the game.

Maybe I am being unfair. She has shown immense mental strength at times. At the US Open, when she was struggling in the heat to the point of lying on the court in wait of medical attention, she gathered herself and carried on admirably to win the match! So when she made a relatively poor start to the 2017 clay court season it was easy to put it down to an understandable dip in form that can happen as a player gets used to a surface again. However, in her French Open 1st round loss Konta had looked in control for the first set but let the match slip away. Sure, she did a few technical things wrong and clay has not been her best surface to date but most people were expecting more. Was this the first signs of the pressure beginning to affect her?

Before we chronically overreact to a potential crisis that is not a crisis we must remember that she is doing fine. For now at least. She has only dropped two ranking spots which is normal fluctuation and she has reacted well to her underwhelming spring results by reaching the final in Nottingham only yesterday. She lost to Vekic in what was a tight 3 set score-line.

Still, it is hard not to feel that Konta is at a crossroads in her career right now. The way I see it, it could go one of three ways. She could simply maintain her current form hanging comfortably around the top 10. That is fine for many. Or she can go higher still. Attempt to make it all the way to the top. This is something that every player dreams of and Konta has expressed her ambition to do this exactly in recent months. She seems game for the challenge but her results recently are not supporting the achievement of it. Or she could go down. What every player dreads…

There is no real reason to assume that she will fall into the fate held by that dreaded third road. Not at the moment anyway. But it is reasonable to presume that at some point Konta would awaken from her 2 year long dream. That she would pinch herself and find out that it is indeed all real and just for a little time she may wonder to herself: which way next? This might just be Johanna Konta’s crossroad. Right now she is at a junction and she must keep calm to choose her next direction wisely. If not her dream could easily turn into a nightmare.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

#Tennis Kids of Instagram

There is only one way that a sport like tennis can grow. We need young people to continue to watch, participate in and improve our sport: so it’s nice to see on Instagram that there are no shortage of kids and young adults who love our sport! For anyone who isn’t familiar with the ‘Rich kids of Instagram’ it is a verified Insta account that gives an insight into the world of 20 somethings with way too much money (which is often, but not always, from their parents) and their lavish lifestyles. If you want to check it out then please do but please, READ THIS FIRST!  Anyway, it got me thinking I should do some real journalism for once and that we need to celebrate the stories behind the hard working, enthusiastic, ambitious and inspiring ‘Tennis Kids of Instagram’. The future of our sport! Here are the stories of 4 very different but equally amazing 5-17 year olds who all share one thing: they love tennis. This article is written in order of age category so please read right to the e

5 things we learned from the French Open 2017: Lesson 5

Lesson #5 The game is in flux! Okay, so, a little contradictory? I know: I’m just after implying that the matches at this year’s French Open were more predictable than normal and I stand by it! In terms of outcome that is. As I said, it appeared that identifying which player was physically stronger often answered the question of who would win. So if we could guess the result then what do I mean by ‘the game is in flux’? Well firstly let us think back on some of the score lines from the tournament. While it is true that the winner was often predictable the manner in which they got there was so often not. The Halep vs Svitolina encounter was always going to be a tight one. Hence, the fact Svitolina stretched her to 3 sets was pretty regular. But if anyone foresaw the demolition that would follow in the decider then I would like to congratulate you and maybe even employ you to write these for me! The momentum was so obviously with Svitolina….so how come Halep took it 6-0?? She

Mid-Season Roundup: Injury Issues

There was a running theme throughout this year’s Wimbledon and unfortunately it was not a positive one. We have become accustomed to talking about the impact of the weather at Wimbledon over the years and the impact it can have as a third player, but this year the spotlight was on a different issue: injury! Indeed, it was the talk of the first round as the centre court crowd saw two consecutive mid-match retirements when both Klizan and Dolgopolov succumbed to injuries they had carried into the tournament. Under current rules a player may not take a medical time out in circumstances where the issue already existed before the match. Hence, they had no option but to concede defeat….. Or did they? I only ask because the decision sparked a lot of controversy! For those that didn’t hear the discussions, a first round Wimbledon loser gets around £30,000 (maybe as much as £35,000- I honestly don’t remember) for participating in the tournament: regardless of the score-line. This, o