If there is one guy I
hate writing about its Stan Wawrinka!! But probably not for the reasons you
are thinking…
Actually, as a player and as a personality I really love
Stan. In fact, it’s a shame the tennis
world doesn’t talk about him as often as we probably should. He is, after
all, a 3 time grand slam champion at 3 different slams and holds an impressive
75% success rate when he reaches a major final.
However, the thing is….he is an
impossibly annoying subject to write about!! Why?
1)
He’s unpredictable:
I like to make predictions, especially before grand slam events, which
sometimes hit the mark and other times (more often than not) don’t. Trying to
guess where Wawrinka is at, however, is a sure fire route to public humiliation…
2)
He’s unpredictable:
Not only does Stan’s form go up and down like an elevator from tournament to
tournament, but he can also find a world beating level from seemingly nowhere
at a moment’s notice without any warning. Hence, making judging his chances pre
event even less possible, and…
3)
He’s
unpredictable: Did I mention already? But really, it’s not just his game
that’s perplexing but emotionally Stan is an enigma. When he wins he points to
his head to highlight his mental strength. It’s a resource he has in stacks as
he isn’t one to crack under pressure. You could even say he rises to big
occasions when the opportunity presents itself by producing a level well above
his yearly average. A ‘Super Stan’ version of himself that hibernates during
masters events but awakens when the big 4 really wish it wouldn’t. Yet, for
long enough his mind was also his greatest weakness. Wawrinka was a late
developer where slam success was concerned winning his first at the age of 28.
He left his wife and daughter in 2015 to focus fully on tennis which doesn’t
suggest the image of someone mentally strong and capable of multitasking the
demands of the tour with the stresses of family life. He has also been very
open about the empty feeling some of his greatest victories have brought him.
So surely anyone standing in the locker-room/
corridor with Stan before his 2016 US Open final, when he admitted to having a
near panic attack experience and had to fight to stop crying, wouldn’t have
really expected him to have a chance in that match? …yet….
So that’s my excuse
for not writing about Wawrinka more but what about everyone else’s? Because I
don’t believe it’s an exaggeration to say Stan is in danger of becoming the
forgotten man.
Maybe it’s just that some commentators and journalists feel
there isn’t the demand. Federer and Nadal have massive worldwide and long
established fan bases and (as two of the greatest of all time) it is hard to
resist the urge to bring them into any tennis conversation. Djokovic has been
the dominant force for the last few years and has given everyone lots to talk
about technique and personality wise. With his flatter groundstrokes,
impressive speed, knack for turning defence into offence and pioneering
popularisation of sliding on a hard court he is hard to ignore. Not to mention
those old videos of the player impressions. Rounding off the big 4 is Andy
Murray. In addition to being the treasure of Britain he has built impressive
following in China?!? So does Stan just not have as many fans and so we overlook
him because we think people don’t care about his achievements or struggles?
Well, it is true he doesn’t have quite the following of the
other active multiple slam winners: you only need to look at social media
following figures to see that. Even in his home country of Switzerland he is
the second in command because of a guy called Federer. But he has built up in
this respect more with every triumph. I
think a lot of people who do support Stan have taken to him because of his
‘ordinary guy’ brand. He’s not an impossibly graceful tennis player/ballet
dancer hybrid and slick media man who gets dressed in sequin snake design
jackets by Gucci for functions. Nor is he a fantastic gymnastic health food
enthusiast with a rawist restaurant who meditates at Buddhist temples and does
ariel yoga. At least not that I know of…He’s
actually quite relatable.
So is it that he just is not good enough in terms of skill??
Yes, he is perhaps unlucky to be in the era of the big 4: unless he can
accelerate now he will forever be fifth man (whatever the rankings say) and he
is fast running out of time. But it’s not like there’s nothing technical to
talk about regarding Wawrinka. I mean that singlehanded backhand is just!!!!
For me that one shot is so stunningly beautiful to watch that when it’s firing
it eclipses the backhand of every member of the big 4 - yes even the peak
Djokovic two hander! It is crazy to suggest Wawrinka doesn’t possess enough
skill to mention. When Stan is on top
form he can beat anyone. The problem is, he is not on his top form
consistently enough.
Even excellence is
easily forgotten when it is interspersed by vast periods of… averageness.
Still, Wawrinka’s average is better than yours. I guarantee
it. It’s certainly better than mine. The bottom line is we need to credit this
man for the way he has infiltrated the top of the game. He was always there but
since 2013 he has really carved out a right to seriously join the conversation.
In my opinion, it’s time we accept the big 5.
True, the big 4 have all held the number 1 singles ranking:
something Stan hasn’t and quite possibly won’t ever do. If we take Andy Murray,
the weakest of the big 4, then he is better than Stan in terms of consistency.
No doubt. But…when Stan and Murray are both at their absolute peaks then, I
would argue, Wawrinka’s best is slightly better than Andy’s. Even if you
disagree with this opinion I’m sure you can acknowledge that the gulf between
Djokovic and Murray is far greater than that between Murray and Wawrinka. So either there is a big 3 or there is a
big 5, up to you!
Stan Wawrinka is 32 years old and so who knows for how much
longer he will play. In fact, he has just announced he will not play for the
remainder of the 2017 season while he recovers from knee surgery and will most
likely have a fight on his hands when he does return to get back to his current
ranking. But I for one am going to try remember to talk a lot more about him
for whatever is left of his career, because for ‘Stan The Man’ to be forgotten
would be the biggest injustice of all.
Comments
Post a Comment
Feel free to leave your comments and use this page for tennis discussion (but keep it clean) and I might even blog about your topics!