Skip to main content

Mid-Season Roundup: Grass is just for cows…and a guy named Roger

“Grass is just for cows” that old quote that someone said once and people like me haven’t stopped using in articles since. Who was it again? Certainly wasn’t 8 time Wimbledon winner Roger Federer: that’s for sure! Okay, so I know it was Manuel Santana but one would be forgiven for mistaking the origin on someone like….Rafael Nadal?

Now, I’m not saying that Nadal is bad on grass! Partially because I fear the backlash from the millions of Rafans worldwide but mainly because it would be unfair and simply untrue….however…..

I think at this stage of his career even Rafa himself would be happy to admit that it is the surface he feels the least comfortable on. I mean, as uncomfortable as someone who has won it twice (one of which required him to beat the great Federer) could ever feel! But we must acknowledge that since that fateful 2012 Nadal on grass has been more woe than whoa.

It all started with a Czech player by the name of Lukas Rosol who came from nowhere to upset Nadal in the 2nd round of Wimbledon. At world number 100 the result shook the tennis world. But really it shouldn’t have been anything to worry about – Nadal may not have played his supreme best but Rosol was on fire hitting 90 mph forehands with pinpoint accuracy and at 5 sets it wasn’t exactly a demolition job. Unfortunately, self-confidence can be a fragile concept and it has since seemed like Rafa has been sent into something of a grass court tailspin with well documented losses having come to the likes of Steve Darcis in 2013, Nick Kyrgios in 2014, Dustin Brown in 2015 (and 2014 in Halle). In 2016 injury forced his withdrawal from Wimbledon meaning that for 5 consecutive years the name Nadal was absent from the list of quarter-finalists.

To be fair, Rafael Nadal’s career has at times been hampered by various injury troubles and he has spoken out about the effect the grass court surface in particular has on his knees. He is the undisputed king of clay but, having been brought up on Spanish clay courts with a topspin heavy aggressive baseliner playing style, Wimbledon was always likely to pose a bigger challenge. Furthermore, he has been unlucky in the respect that the players he has lost to all seem to be genuinely inspired and play out of their skin tennis on the day of their match. But I can’t help but feel that if it hadn’t been for the Rosol loss then he would have found a way through a couple more of the aforementioned defeats. His confidence might have been higher, theirs might have been lower and the result might have been different…especially over 5 sets!

So what better than his 2017 ‘La Decima’ triumph to restore the Rafaith? I honestly thought that heading into Wimbledon 2017 his chances were looking far more favourable. Although, I did fear a lack of warm up tournament could be a risk! Still in the back of my mind I wondered if prospective opponents like Millman, Young and Khachanov could cause some trouble. But Rafa swept past all 3 in straight sets style! He seemed only enhanced by his decision to rest and picked up where he had left off on the clay. So when he faced Gilles Muller in the fourth round I didn’t think much of it…..and the rest is history as they say. 15-13 in the fifth as Muller pulled off the win of his career and for the 6th year in a row no quarterfinal for Nadal.


So where does this leave us? We can argue he was tired from the French Open, he didn’t have enough grass practice, his confidence has been damaged or he is just unlucky that opponents often bring their very best against him. Maybe the truth involves a mixture of all of this? But really, it all comes down to the reality that Rafael Nadal just doesn’t feel at home on grass. He may never win another Wimbledon but, you know what Rafans? It doesn’t matter! Because he is a legend with 15 grand slams and, after all, “grass is just for cows”.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

#Tennis Kids of Instagram

There is only one way that a sport like tennis can grow. We need young people to continue to watch, participate in and improve our sport: so it’s nice to see on Instagram that there are no shortage of kids and young adults who love our sport! For anyone who isn’t familiar with the ‘Rich kids of Instagram’ it is a verified Insta account that gives an insight into the world of 20 somethings with way too much money (which is often, but not always, from their parents) and their lavish lifestyles. If you want to check it out then please do but please, READ THIS FIRST!  Anyway, it got me thinking I should do some real journalism for once and that we need to celebrate the stories behind the hard working, enthusiastic, ambitious and inspiring ‘Tennis Kids of Instagram’. The future of our sport! Here are the stories of 4 very different but equally amazing 5-17 year olds who all share one thing: they love tennis. This article is written in order of age category so please read right to the e

5 things we learned from the French Open 2017: Lesson 5

Lesson #5 The game is in flux! Okay, so, a little contradictory? I know: I’m just after implying that the matches at this year’s French Open were more predictable than normal and I stand by it! In terms of outcome that is. As I said, it appeared that identifying which player was physically stronger often answered the question of who would win. So if we could guess the result then what do I mean by ‘the game is in flux’? Well firstly let us think back on some of the score lines from the tournament. While it is true that the winner was often predictable the manner in which they got there was so often not. The Halep vs Svitolina encounter was always going to be a tight one. Hence, the fact Svitolina stretched her to 3 sets was pretty regular. But if anyone foresaw the demolition that would follow in the decider then I would like to congratulate you and maybe even employ you to write these for me! The momentum was so obviously with Svitolina….so how come Halep took it 6-0?? She

Mid-Season Roundup: Injury Issues

There was a running theme throughout this year’s Wimbledon and unfortunately it was not a positive one. We have become accustomed to talking about the impact of the weather at Wimbledon over the years and the impact it can have as a third player, but this year the spotlight was on a different issue: injury! Indeed, it was the talk of the first round as the centre court crowd saw two consecutive mid-match retirements when both Klizan and Dolgopolov succumbed to injuries they had carried into the tournament. Under current rules a player may not take a medical time out in circumstances where the issue already existed before the match. Hence, they had no option but to concede defeat….. Or did they? I only ask because the decision sparked a lot of controversy! For those that didn’t hear the discussions, a first round Wimbledon loser gets around £30,000 (maybe as much as £35,000- I honestly don’t remember) for participating in the tournament: regardless of the score-line. This, o