Lesson #3
No man (or woman) is
a machine...
This post is perhaps more personal to me than has been the
case so far. Actually, I have a confession to make! So make a cup of tea, sit
down and brace yourselves for a revelation….I am a Djokovic fan. I know, it’s
not the hot thing to be right now but don’t try to save me friends: my
appreciation of the Djoker already runs way too deep.
Seriously though, it’s not exactly news to any follower of
the ATP tour (fan of Djokovic or not) that his form has taken somewhat of a
nose dive in the last 12 months. It all started at Wimbledon 2016 when he
crashed out of the 3rd round to the ‘blind squirrel that found a
nut’- Sam Querry- in 4 sets (don’t look at me like that! That’s the words of
Querry’s own coach, not mine!!). But, realistically, for a man who had just
conquered the pinnacles of the sport by holding all 4 slams at once (something
not even Federer and Nadal have managed to date) it was not initially that
concerning to most. However, since then there have been, by his impressive
standards, some moments of horror form wise. The Olympic Games 1st
round and the Australian Open 2nd round in particular jump out.
These, mixed in amongst average results that have mainly included 4th
rounds and quarterfinals. Yet, there have also been brief flashes of brilliance!
He made the finals of the 2016 US Open and London, the semi of Shanghai, he won
in Canada and in Qatar and even dispatched ‘Nadal killer’ Dominic Thiem with a
bagel and breadstick combo in Rome literally days before the French Open
started!!!! So why then the third set 0-6 thrashing accompanied by justified accusations
of tanking only a couple of weeks later? Its little wonder French publication l’equip
nicknamed him monsieur yo-yo.
So what’s going on with him? No one knows for sure and it is
beginning to look doubtful that he himself is certain. He has alluded to
personal, physical, emotional, confidence and motivation related issues. The
truth is it is probably a mixture of several, if not all, these factors. After
all, no man (or woman) is a machine.
If we did not already know this then it was a point the
French Open drove home harder than ever. Djokovic was not himself. A passion
for the game: a hunger to even try to stay in the match after the 1st
set seemed completely and worryingly absent. For a long time commentators and
bloggers have made reference to Djokovic the cyborg. The Serbian robot that
gets plugged in at night and comes back recharged every day. Perhaps there were
compliments in their somewhere? If by this they mean he was almost unhuman in
his consistency for a period, then fine. But I suspect many were referring as
much to his style of play and shot selection choices. I never saw the accuracy
in the comparison personally: especially not in his personality or sense of
humour. Still, if Djokovic was a machine (if he is a machine) then it was
evident this French Open that he needs some repair work.
But let us not think other players are immune to this
situation! We don’t need to look far to see that Andy Murray has had some
physical issues this year which are probably a direct result from the immense effort
expended last year. Even the 18 slam winning, GOAT candidate, Roger Federer
took time out after his unexpected Australian Open victory and hard court
career resurgence. His absence from the red dirt was maybe the biggest reminder
of all that no man is a machine. Or Angelique Kerber who, since becoming world
number 1, is having a rough patch of form which is possibly resultant from an introverts
struggle to deal with the limelight and weight of expectation that goes with
this ranking. Her 1st round French Open loss made her look very
human. As did the emotional press conference following defending champion Garbine
Muguruza’s’ defeat. What about Halep? Was she simply out powered and outplayed
or did she let the final slip from her grasp because she played too
conservatively. Tightly? Nervously, even?
Going into Wimbledon this is definitely an interesting
aspect to watch. Can these guys recover on grass? Maybe. Can Nadal and
Ostapenko continue their dominance? It’s not improbable but, before you go
putting money on either, we would do well to remember that no man or woman is a
machine!
Disagree? You are entitled! Comments are very welcome J
See you tomorrow for lesson #4
Comments
Post a Comment
Feel free to leave your comments and use this page for tennis discussion (but keep it clean) and I might even blog about your topics!