Skip to main content

5 things we learned from the French Open 2017: Lesson 3

Lesson #3
No man (or woman) is a machine...

This post is perhaps more personal to me than has been the case so far. Actually, I have a confession to make! So make a cup of tea, sit down and brace yourselves for a revelation….I am a Djokovic fan. I know, it’s not the hot thing to be right now but don’t try to save me friends: my appreciation of the Djoker already runs way too deep.

Seriously though, it’s not exactly news to any follower of the ATP tour (fan of Djokovic or not) that his form has taken somewhat of a nose dive in the last 12 months. It all started at Wimbledon 2016 when he crashed out of the 3rd round to the ‘blind squirrel that found a nut’- Sam Querry- in 4 sets (don’t look at me like that! That’s the words of Querry’s own coach, not mine!!). But, realistically, for a man who had just conquered the pinnacles of the sport by holding all 4 slams at once (something not even Federer and Nadal have managed to date) it was not initially that concerning to most. However, since then there have been, by his impressive standards, some moments of horror form wise. The Olympic Games 1st round and the Australian Open 2nd round in particular jump out. These, mixed in amongst average results that have mainly included 4th rounds and quarterfinals. Yet, there have also been brief flashes of brilliance! He made the finals of the 2016 US Open and London, the semi of Shanghai, he won in Canada and in Qatar and even dispatched ‘Nadal killer’ Dominic Thiem with a bagel and breadstick combo in Rome literally days before the French Open started!!!! So why then the third set 0-6 thrashing accompanied by justified accusations of tanking only a couple of weeks later? Its little wonder French publication l’equip nicknamed him monsieur yo-yo.

So what’s going on with him? No one knows for sure and it is beginning to look doubtful that he himself is certain. He has alluded to personal, physical, emotional, confidence and motivation related issues. The truth is it is probably a mixture of several, if not all, these factors. After all, no man (or woman) is a machine.

If we did not already know this then it was a point the French Open drove home harder than ever. Djokovic was not himself. A passion for the game: a hunger to even try to stay in the match after the 1st set seemed completely and worryingly absent. For a long time commentators and bloggers have made reference to Djokovic the cyborg. The Serbian robot that gets plugged in at night and comes back recharged every day. Perhaps there were compliments in their somewhere? If by this they mean he was almost unhuman in his consistency for a period, then fine. But I suspect many were referring as much to his style of play and shot selection choices. I never saw the accuracy in the comparison personally: especially not in his personality or sense of humour. Still, if Djokovic was a machine (if he is a machine) then it was evident this French Open that he needs some repair work.

But let us not think other players are immune to this situation! We don’t need to look far to see that Andy Murray has had some physical issues this year which are probably a direct result from the immense effort expended last year. Even the 18 slam winning, GOAT candidate, Roger Federer took time out after his unexpected Australian Open victory and hard court career resurgence. His absence from the red dirt was maybe the biggest reminder of all that no man is a machine. Or Angelique Kerber who, since becoming world number 1, is having a rough patch of form which is possibly resultant from an introverts struggle to deal with the limelight and weight of expectation that goes with this ranking. Her 1st round French Open loss made her look very human. As did the emotional press conference following defending champion Garbine Muguruza’s’ defeat. What about Halep? Was she simply out powered and outplayed or did she let the final slip from her grasp because she played too conservatively. Tightly? Nervously, even?

Going into Wimbledon this is definitely an interesting aspect to watch. Can these guys recover on grass? Maybe. Can Nadal and Ostapenko continue their dominance? It’s not improbable but, before you go putting money on either, we would do well to remember that no man or woman is a machine!

Disagree? You are entitled! Comments are very welcome J

See you tomorrow for lesson #4 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

#Tennis Kids of Instagram

There is only one way that a sport like tennis can grow. We need young people to continue to watch, participate in and improve our sport: so it’s nice to see on Instagram that there are no shortage of kids and young adults who love our sport! For anyone who isn’t familiar with the ‘Rich kids of Instagram’ it is a verified Insta account that gives an insight into the world of 20 somethings with way too much money (which is often, but not always, from their parents) and their lavish lifestyles. If you want to check it out then please do but please, READ THIS FIRST!  Anyway, it got me thinking I should do some real journalism for once and that we need to celebrate the stories behind the hard working, enthusiastic, ambitious and inspiring ‘Tennis Kids of Instagram’. The future of our sport! Here are the stories of 4 very different but equally amazing 5-17 year olds who all share one thing: they love tennis. This article is written in order of age category so please read right to t...

5 things we learned from the French Open 2017: Lesson 5

Lesson #5 The game is in flux! Okay, so, a little contradictory? I know: I’m just after implying that the matches at this year’s French Open were more predictable than normal and I stand by it! In terms of outcome that is. As I said, it appeared that identifying which player was physically stronger often answered the question of who would win. So if we could guess the result then what do I mean by ‘the game is in flux’? Well firstly let us think back on some of the score lines from the tournament. While it is true that the winner was often predictable the manner in which they got there was so often not. The Halep vs Svitolina encounter was always going to be a tight one. Hence, the fact Svitolina stretched her to 3 sets was pretty regular. But if anyone foresaw the demolition that would follow in the decider then I would like to congratulate you and maybe even employ you to write these for me! The momentum was so obviously with Svitolina….so how come Halep took it 6-0?? She ...

Mid-Season Roundup: Injury Issues

There was a running theme throughout this year’s Wimbledon and unfortunately it was not a positive one. We have become accustomed to talking about the impact of the weather at Wimbledon over the years and the impact it can have as a third player, but this year the spotlight was on a different issue: injury! Indeed, it was the talk of the first round as the centre court crowd saw two consecutive mid-match retirements when both Klizan and Dolgopolov succumbed to injuries they had carried into the tournament. Under current rules a player may not take a medical time out in circumstances where the issue already existed before the match. Hence, they had no option but to concede defeat….. Or did they? I only ask because the decision sparked a lot of controversy! For those that didn’t hear the discussions, a first round Wimbledon loser gets around £30,000 (maybe as much as £35,000- I honestly don’t remember) for participating in the tournament: regardless of the score-line. This, o...